On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Vladimir Perić <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everyone. >> >> I have made the first release candidate for SymPy 0.7.1. You can >> download the source at >> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.tar.gz, >> a Windows32 installer at >> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.win32.exe, >> and the docs for this version at >> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1-docs-html.zip. >> >> The release notes are at >> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-0.7.1. I will >> give this in more detail when I do the full release, but the big >> changes here are that isympy now works in IPython 0.11, which will be >> released soon, Pyglet is now an optional external dependency, Python >> 2.4 is no longer supported, and our docs use MathJax to render the >> LaTeX math. There have also been several bug fixes and new >> functionality (see the full release notes). >> >> So please download the release and test it. Also, since our docs have >> received a significant update with the MathJax, I ask that you also >> download the docs and see if they render correctly in your broswer of >> choice. Some pages that use a lot of MathJax math include >> modules/simplify/hyperexpand.html, most of the mpmath documentation, >> and modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html. We also enabled a feature in >> Sphinx that lets you view the source code of a function in the >> documentation. So, next to every function definition, there should be >> a "source" button which takes you to the source code of the function. >> >> If there are no major problems, I will do the full release in about a week. >> >> Aaron Meurer >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sympy" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. >> >> > > I've run the usual tests on my computer, everything seems fine. One > issue is the hyperexpand tests. They rely on random numbers so they > fail occasionally (see the SymPy-hyperexpand job on Jenkins, they fail > about 1% of the time with ness' latest patch). This is bad because > users might think this is some more important failure. On the other > hand, simply reverting the whole patchset is no good either, as it > does bring nice new features. So, if ness doesn't manage to solve it > completely in a few days it might be a good idea to apply a patch to > branch that'll use some specific numbers in the tests. > > -- > Vladimir Perić >
I'm not sure if that's a good idea. The point of the random tests is to increase coverage. Tom, what is your opinion on this? Aaron Meurer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
