On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Vladimir Perić <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi everyone. >>> >>> I have made the first release candidate for SymPy 0.7.1. You can >>> download the source at >>> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.tar.gz, >>> a Windows32 installer at >>> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.win32.exe, >>> and the docs for this version at >>> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1-docs-html.zip. >>> >>> The release notes are at >>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-0.7.1. I will >>> give this in more detail when I do the full release, but the big >>> changes here are that isympy now works in IPython 0.11, which will be >>> released soon, Pyglet is now an optional external dependency, Python >>> 2.4 is no longer supported, and our docs use MathJax to render the >>> LaTeX math. There have also been several bug fixes and new >>> functionality (see the full release notes). >>> >>> So please download the release and test it. Also, since our docs have >>> received a significant update with the MathJax, I ask that you also >>> download the docs and see if they render correctly in your broswer of >>> choice. Some pages that use a lot of MathJax math include >>> modules/simplify/hyperexpand.html, most of the mpmath documentation, >>> and modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html. We also enabled a feature in >>> Sphinx that lets you view the source code of a function in the >>> documentation. So, next to every function definition, there should be >>> a "source" button which takes you to the source code of the function. >>> >>> If there are no major problems, I will do the full release in about a week. >>> >>> Aaron Meurer >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "sympy" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >> I've run the usual tests on my computer, everything seems fine. One >> issue is the hyperexpand tests. They rely on random numbers so they >> fail occasionally (see the SymPy-hyperexpand job on Jenkins, they fail >> about 1% of the time with ness' latest patch). This is bad because >> users might think this is some more important failure. On the other >> hand, simply reverting the whole patchset is no good either, as it >> does bring nice new features. So, if ness doesn't manage to solve it >> completely in a few days it might be a good idea to apply a patch to >> branch that'll use some specific numbers in the tests. >> >> -- >> Vladimir Perić >> > > I'm not sure if that's a good idea. The point of the random tests is > to increase coverage. Tom, what is your opinion on this?
I also don't like random tests, because it is not robust. I think that random tests should be disabled by default, but can be turned on if needed. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
