On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Julien Rioux <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 20:41:15 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > I see it now. That pep is very confusing. So should the correct way > really be 0.7.2c1 (without the r)? > > You're reading it correctly, it recommends using 0.7.2c1, but as I understand 0.7.2rc1 is also valid and deviates less from the naming scheme that you have been using. I noticed that you decided against adding the "-py2.5" naming scheme to the python 2 tarball. python3 pip install might pick up the wrong version now, since it considers both sympy-0.7.2.tar.gz and sympy-0.7.2-py3.x.tar.gz as compatible and equivalent versions, and who knows which one it will sort first. Well it seems to be doing the right thing. If someone reports that it doesn't, I'll try to fix it. But uploading three python 2 tarballs didn't seem worth the trouble and confusion if it wasn't needed. Aaron Meurer Regards, Julien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/W4njF5R4m0UJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
