On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Joachim Durchholz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 26.04.2014 21:50, schrieb Ondřej Čertík: > >> Thanks Alan. Yes, I did. I tried simple benchmarks and SymbolicC++ is even >> slower than Sympy. > > > Wow. > So much for the assumption "C++ is generally faster than Python". > At best, it's potentially faster :-)
It is generally (a lot) faster, but you need to use the same algorithms. Why apparently SymbolicC++ doesn't use. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVDC%3D-2YiBbOxyLdhYUiQ_42g%3DdkwdQRUdKYGA85a0tp7Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
