See link http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Faculty/Homepages/fateman.html
On 04/27/2014 05:24 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
Am 27.04.2014 23:00, schrieb Richard Fateman:
PS So far as I know, sympy is slower than the equivalent (free) Lisp
code.
Any pointers to that one?
So yes, it is re-inventing the wheel.
So many wheels, so many ways to invent them...
> Worse, it is reproducing the chain of errors in design that led
to existing computer algebra systems.
Which ones do you mean?
And in general, if you think this is all misguided - what are you
doing here?
Just curious what thinking is motivating you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/535D7A9F.1020308%40verizon.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
