On Sunday, April 27, 2014 2:24:27 PM UTC-7, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am 27.04.2014 23:00, schrieb Richard Fateman: > > PS So far as I know, sympy is slower than the equivalent (free) Lisp > code. > > Any pointers to that one? > > > So yes, it is re-inventing the wheel. > > So many wheels, so many ways to invent them... > > > Worse, it is reproducing the chain of errors in design that led > > to existing computer algebra systems. > > Which ones do you mean? > managing assumptions. treating algebraic roots. fo 2 examples.
> > And in general, if you think this is all misguided - what are you doing > here? > trying to educate. the world does not need more crappy duplicative software. even in python. Just curious what thinking is motivating you. > what motivates you? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/290da599-2570-4537-bb63-66aa3b91aa32%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
