On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 10:51 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: > > > > Garbage mainly, I'll do a proper test tomorrow, and have a trawl myself. > > Between us we've got a good test platform. I've been wanting an excuse > > to dig into librapi :) > > > One of the main differences I see in the code of rapi/registry.c and > rapi2/registry2.c is that within registry.c it looks like you are sending > the complete buffer over the line, while within registry2 I don't. (You > can see this clearly with the CeRegQueryInfoKey(2). Though it would not > explain why till now it has been working because I am not doing any weird > things extra within the synce-registry.c. > > Please let me know when you have a patched version, I can check then > whether your new stuff breaks my new stuff :) >
Hi Guido Committed your patch with regards to the library functions, I'm sure what I'm seeing is nothing to do with them. I've held back the improvements to the synce-registry tool until we figure out what the problem with rapi1 is, don't want to break it completely for legacy devices in the meantime. Ta Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
