On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 08:41 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: > On Friday 07 December 2007 20:16:06 David Eriksson wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:32 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: > > > due to the different code number within rapi and rapi2. It would be > > > really weird to me if Microsoft changed the complete protocol while going > > > from rapi to rapi2. > > > > IIRC, the protocol has changed a bit and it is simpler encoded in RAPI2 > > compared to the old RAPI. > > If I look at some of the code of rapi1 compared to rapi2 I can imagine that. > I > would like to help and get this working though, but it would mean I would > need some wire dumps of what exactly is sent over the line. > If someone could provide me that information, I would be happy to try and > figure out what exactly goes wrong in the current rapi1 code. >
Guido, not something I've ever done before, but happy to try if you give me pointers. David, is this how librapi was written in the first place, or did you have some decent docs on the comms specification ? Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
