> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 08:41 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: >> On Friday 07 December 2007 20:16:06 David Eriksson wrote: >> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:32 +0100, Guido Diepen wrote: >> > > due to the different code number within rapi and rapi2. It would be >> > > really weird to me if Microsoft changed the complete protocol while >> going >> > > from rapi to rapi2. >> > >> > IIRC, the protocol has changed a bit and it is simpler encoded in >> RAPI2 >> > compared to the old RAPI. >> >> If I look at some of the code of rapi1 compared to rapi2 I can imagine >> that. I >> would like to help and get this working though, but it would mean I >> would >> need some wire dumps of what exactly is sent over the line. >> If someone could provide me that information, I would be happy to try >> and >> figure out what exactly goes wrong in the current rapi1 code. >> > > Guido, not something I've ever done before, but happy to try if you give > me pointers. > > David, is this how librapi was written in the first place, or did you > have some decent docs on the comms specification ?
Two words: Reverse Engineering If you remind me enough times I can probably describe how to implement any RAPI/RAPI2 call... only I need to be at home and boot my MS Windows machine to get the info... :-) \David ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
