On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:06 +0000, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 16:56 +0000, Dr J A Gow wrote:
> > In general disambiguation is a good thing. But why should both of them
> > be present in the same directory? Surely we should only copy/symlink the
> > appropriate plugin for the particular installed version of OpenSync -
> > not copy them both over (and thus have an unused module in OpenSync's
> > plugin directory)?
>
> Well, you talk about copy/symlinking the appropriate plugin, but from
> where? I think the days of running SyncEngine from the directory you
> checked it out from are gone. I'm not sure what's the problem with
> having two opensync modules in the folder -- it's not as if they're are
> very big:
>
I think we may have been talking at cross-purposes. I was referring to
the proposal to copy both plugins to the OpenSync plugin directory. In
this case there will always be one of the two plugins that will be a
redundant module that should _not_ be used with the particular version
of OpenSync - but both will be visible on an msynctool --listplugins.
This would be bad.
John.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
