On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 19:15 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Mark Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Casting for opinions, do you guys think it's appropriate for the
> > sync-engine source to install a dbus session file, to kick it off
> > automagically when called, or is this something for distros ? I can't
> > decide.
> >
> > Mine is currently run with
> > --detached --logfile=~/.synce/sync-engine.log --once
> >
> > and works like a charm.
> >
I'm not sure that the sync-engine source should do this. I, for one, run
sync-engine differently to this (I run it manually and leave it running
in the background with --detached --logfile=~/sync-engine.log ) and
having sync-engine make policy decisions about how it is run could
reduce choice for those users who do not want d-bus to start
sync-engine. My opinion is that this should be done by the distribution
(where policy can vary as desired).
John.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
