On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 16:01 +0100, Dr J A Gow wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 19:15 +0100, John Carr wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Mark Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Casting for opinions, do you guys think it's appropriate for the > > > sync-engine source to install a dbus session file, to kick it off > > > automagically when called, or is this something for distros ? I can't > > > decide. > > > > > > Mine is currently run with > > > --detached --logfile=~/.synce/sync-engine.log --once > > > > > > and works like a charm. > > > > > I'm not sure that the sync-engine source should do this. I, for one, run > sync-engine differently to this (I run it manually and leave it running > in the background with --detached --logfile=~/sync-engine.log ) and > having sync-engine make policy decisions about how it is run could > reduce choice for those users who do not want d-bus to start > sync-engine. My opinion is that this should be done by the distribution > (where policy can vary as desired). >
I'd tend to agree with (Dr) John here. When I asked the question I was almost trying to convince myself. I'll add a dbus file, but get it installed to the same place as the example config file, then John (Carr) and anyone else that wants it can just fiddle with the distro package build. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
