On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Dr J A Gow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 18:22 +0100, John Carr wrote:
>
> >
> > Those changes were made to support the version of pyrex in Debian
> > Unstable AFAIK. Pyrex sucks at compatibility :-)
> >
> But does the original syntax work with Debian pyrex? If so, we should
> perhaps reverse it. If not, it would seem that Debian pyrex is the
> oddball. Anybody with different distros than Debian or SuSE care to
> comment?
>
> John.
>
>
It broke Ubuntu Hardy (r3466 is in the debian packages, so i had to patch
the patch), but the next Ubuntu will obviously be the same as Debian and so
OK. From reading the Debian bug report that lead to this change, I *think*
(was a while ago) this part of the change is only a warning in Debian right
now, so could be reverted.
I'm sure i've seen Gentoo suffer as well.
John
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
