On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:29 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:23:27PM +0100, Dr J A Gow wrote:
> > Err - I'm staring at a stock unmodified openSuSE 11 system whose pyrex
> > won't build the python extensions with the 'new' syntax. Ergo, it breaks
> > builds.
>
> For the record, I did actually mean: the old for-loop syntax (that I
> warned about on build in Debian) did not break building. I only changed
> it because I was changing the "type" variable name, and saw some other
> easy-to-fix warnings. I can see the ambiguity though, sorry.
Ah, I understand. Although does this mean that the 'old' for loop syntax
is likely to be deprecated in future python versions? Or is it just a
'cleaner' way of expressing the same thing.
John.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
