On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 06:14:09PM +0100, Dr J A Gow wrote: > The commit of r3466 to librra breaks the build of the python > extensions. Specifically the syntax > > for 0 <= i < count: > > is not recognised by pyrex (at least the pyrex standard in OpenSuSE 11).
This did not break any builds. The use of the variable name "type" broke Debian builds. It also warned about the "old syntax of for loops", so I "fixed" both in that commit. > Is there really anything so wrong with the old syntax that these parts > of the patch should not be reversed? Although it probably will eventually need changing to the new syntax I used, I'm absolutely fine with it being changed back to the previous syntax though. Feel free to commit this immediately. I hope this helps, -- Jonny Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
