On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:54 +0100, John Carr wrote: > +1 on versioning it in line with odccm in future, as it is basically a > souped up odccm rather than something from scratch... And its not like > odccm has gone through as many versions as libsynce, either. Its also > nice for the core components to be in step with each other for > clarities sake. > > It would also be nice if we packaged this in favor of odccm this time > around, and started to phase out odccm.
For now I'll package another 'svn snapshot' (even if it's identical to 0.2) and keep versioning it 0.11.1, to avoid using an epoch - hopefully it can get re-versioned to 0.12 and then there won't be a problem. I already killed odccm in Mandriva development distro (Cooker) several weeks back. It's all HAL now. Once I've tested both WM2003 and WM5+ in Cooker to my satisfaction, I'll backport the whole bundle to 2008 Spring's /backports repository. -- adamw ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
