On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 23:02 +0200, David Richardson wrote: > I implemented reading of the output_size and output_buffer too. I > couldn't figure out how to actually run the CeRapiInvoke tests (my > automake experience is lacking) but I did create a separate executable > that does the same thing as those tests. It should pass > test_ping_result and test_ping_buffer now, but not the stream test > (will still return E_NOTIMPL). I didn't check test_last_error yet. >
Hi David, thanks for the patch. I'd like to do some work on the rest of
it, but I do linux programming, not MS :) I've got a trial version of
Visual Studio around somewhere, can you explain how to disable the
device's security from there ?
Ta
Mark
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, David Richardson
> <docgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Mark Ellis
> <m...@mpellis.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:39 +0200, Mark Ellis wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 22:37 +0200, David Richardson
> wrote:
> > > I called CeCreateFile("//test.txt", GENERIC_READ |
> GENERIC_WRITE, 0,
> > > NULL, OPEN_ALWAYS, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
> and watched that
> > > connection on wireshark so I had some basis for
> comparison.
> > >
> > > CeCreateFile has a command code of 0x16 and using
> this knowledge I
> > > believe the command code for CeRapiInvoke is 0x4C
> on WM5. (Which
> > > according to
> > >
>
> https://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/synce/trunk/librapi2/src/rapi2/README
> is already taken by CeSetDatabaseInfoEx which is troubling, I think)
> > >
> > > I've attached the log of CeCreateFile in case
> someone wants to double
> > > check my work or like me finds it easier to
> compare the two
> > > side-by-side.
> > >
> > > My amateur opinion is that CeCreateFile and
> CeRapiInvoke look really
> > > similar on the wire and is hopefully not hard to
> implement for that
> > > reason. I'll try my hand at it today.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David Richardson
> > >
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, David Richardson
> > > <docgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm calling
> > >
> > >
> > > hr = CeRapiInvoke("\\invokeme.dll",
> "PingBuffer",
> > > PING_BUFFER_SIZE, buffer, &output_size,
> &output_buffer, NULL,
> > > 0);
> > >
> > >
> > > with PING_BUFFER_SIZE = 10
> > >
> >
> > David, the trace of the call sent to the device
> looks good. It actually
> > looks exactly like what rapi1 invoke would send
> apart from the command
> > code, which should make life easier.
> >
> > I can't see the data being sent back however. The
> data returned from the
> > first call (packet 16) looks like this
> >
> > 0c 00 00 00 data len = 0x0c = 12
> > 7e 00 00 00 error mod not found
> > 7e 00 07 80
> > 00 00 00 00
> >
> > which would suggest it can't find the dll. Is the
> path correct in your
> > call ?
>
>
> I noticed that as well. Check out this pcap file. I'm
> calling PingResult this time and you can actually see the data
> being returned. PingResult takes a value and returns it as a
> the return code. I'm passing in 0x12345678. I'm trying to
> take it one step at a time and just trying to get the return
> code and error code to be valid before I worry about reading
> the output_size and output_buffer. I've got that working.
> You're right, its pretty much exactly the same as the old
> invoke.
>
> I'll implement the reading of output_size and buffer today and
> send a patch. I'm not going to look into stream mode at this
> time, but may in the future.
>
> Thanks for all the help!
>
>
>
>
> >
> > As for code 0x4c being assigned to
> CeSetDatabaseInfoEx, none of the
> > database functions for rapi2 have been implemented.
> Maybe David (E) can
> > give some indication of how reliable that list is ?
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
>
> Sometimes I wonder why I spend so much time writing
> software that deals
> with MS rubbish :)
>
> Can't invoke on WM5+ because it's in 'RAPI Restricted
> Mode', anyone know
> how to switch to 'Open Mode' ?
>
> I'm not encountering this problem. I'm guessing its because I
> disabled all security in Visual Studio for the device.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > I've attached the wireshark pcap. Ignore
> everything before 12
> > > seconds. I called the identical invoke 3
> times on the
> > > device. buffer should be 10 0xDD's.
> output_buffer and
> > > output_size were uninitialized and when
> finished output_buffer
> > > is identical to buffer and output_size is
> 10
> > > (PING_BUFFER_SIZE).
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sending this to hand it off to you
> guys. I'm still
> > > looking at this myself to see if I can
> implement it or figure
> > > out the command code, but I'm sure the
> people on this list
> > > have more experience doing this.
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me know if you have any questions or
> want me to redo with
> > > some changes.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David Richardson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Mark
> Ellis
> > > <m...@mpellis.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 00:39 +0200,
> David Richardson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:35
> AM, Mark Ellis
> > > <m...@mpellis.org.uk>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at
> 22:10 +0200, David
> > > Eriksson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at
> 18:07 -0700, Captain
> > > Fourier wrote:
> > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have been trying
> to get CeRapiInvoke
> > > to work. Just using
> > > > the unit
> > > > > > tests in the
> release. All I get is
> > > -2147467263 as a return
> > > > result.
> > > > >
> > > > > 0x80004001 means "not
> implemented"
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is CeRapiInvoke
> implemented? Is it still
> > > only Stream mode?
> > > > >
> > > > > UTSL :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately it has
> not been implemented
> > > for Windows Mobile
> > > > 5 or newer
> > > > > devices. Any takers on
> the synce-devel
> > > list?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your
> time,
> > > > > > Rob
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > David Eriksson,
> > > http://www.divideandconquer.se/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rob, I'll take a look at
> this sometime, but
> > > my time is very
> > > > limited at
> > > > the moment, so I'll need
> three things, the
> > > dll you're using on
> > > > the
> > > > device and the code
> you're using to call it,
> > > and the command
> > > > code for
> > > > CeRapiInvoke on WM5 :)
> > > >
> > > > I believe Rob was trying to
> execute the test located
> > > at
> > > >
> > >
>
> http://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/synce/trunk/librapi2/tests/CeRapiInvoke/
> which has a DLL with it.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ah yes, I've never noticed that
> there !
> > >
> > > > If someone can briefly explain
> how I would go about
> > > getting the
> > > > command code for CeRapiInvoke on
> WM5, I have the
> > > necessary hardware
> > > > and time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Theoretically, run a small program
> on a windows host
> > > that just
> > > RapiInit's and calls the command
> we're interested in,
> > > and capture the
> > > transmission on the network
> interface using eg.
> > > wireshark.
> > >
> > > Of course, being MS it's rarely
> that straightforward,
> > > and if David is
> > > correct it could be a lot more
> complex. However, if
> > > you could use the
> > > test prog for CeRapiInvoke from
> windows and capture
> > > everything over the
> > > interface, we might be fortunate.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't have anything
> set up to generate the
> > > call
> > > > on Windows to capture
> that code, so someone
> > > will have to find
> > > > it for me.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > SynCE-Devel mailing list
> > > >
> SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/blackberry
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
