On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Mark Ellis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:39 +0200, Mark Ellis wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 22:37 +0200, David Richardson wrote:
> > > I called CeCreateFile("//test.txt", GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, 0,
> > > NULL, OPEN_ALWAYS, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); and watched that
> > > connection on wireshark so I had some basis for comparison.
> > >
> > > CeCreateFile has a command code of 0x16 and using this knowledge I
> > > believe the command code for CeRapiInvoke is 0x4C on WM5. (Which
> > > according to
> > >
> https://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/synce/trunk/librapi2/src/rapi2/READMEis
> already taken by CeSetDatabaseInfoEx which is troubling, I think)
> > >
> > > I've attached the log of CeCreateFile in case someone wants to double
> > > check my work or like me finds it easier to compare the two
> > > side-by-side.
> > >
> > > My amateur opinion is that CeCreateFile and CeRapiInvoke look really
> > > similar on the wire and is hopefully not hard to implement for that
> > > reason. I'll try my hand at it today.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David Richardson
> > >
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, David Richardson
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'm calling
> > >
> > >
> > > hr = CeRapiInvoke("\\invokeme.dll", "PingBuffer",
> > > PING_BUFFER_SIZE, buffer, &output_size, &output_buffer, NULL,
> > > 0);
> > >
> > >
> > > with PING_BUFFER_SIZE = 10
> > >
> >
> > David, the trace of the call sent to the device looks good. It actually
> > looks exactly like what rapi1 invoke would send apart from the command
> > code, which should make life easier.
> >
> > I can't see the data being sent back however. The data returned from the
> > first call (packet 16) looks like this
> >
> > 0c 00 00 00 data len = 0x0c = 12
> > 7e 00 00 00 error mod not found
> > 7e 00 07 80
> > 00 00 00 00
> >
> > which would suggest it can't find the dll. Is the path correct in your
> > call ?
>
I noticed that as well. Check out this pcap file. I'm calling PingResult
this time and you can actually see the data being returned. PingResult takes
a value and returns it as a the return code. I'm passing in 0x12345678. I'm
trying to take it one step at a time and just trying to get the return code
and error code to be valid before I worry about reading the output_size and
output_buffer. I've got that working. You're right, its pretty much
exactly the same as the old invoke.
I'll implement the reading of output_size and buffer today and send a
patch. I'm not going to look into stream mode at this time, but may in the
future.
Thanks for all the help!
> >
> > As for code 0x4c being assigned to CeSetDatabaseInfoEx, none of the
> > database functions for rapi2 have been implemented. Maybe David (E) can
> > give some indication of how reliable that list is ?
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
> Sometimes I wonder why I spend so much time writing software that deals
> with MS rubbish :)
>
> Can't invoke on WM5+ because it's in 'RAPI Restricted Mode', anyone know
> how to switch to 'Open Mode' ?
I'm not encountering this problem. I'm guessing its because I disabled all
security in Visual Studio for the device.
>
>
>
> > >
> > > I've attached the wireshark pcap. Ignore everything before 12
> > > seconds. I called the identical invoke 3 times on the
> > > device. buffer should be 10 0xDD's. output_buffer and
> > > output_size were uninitialized and when finished output_buffer
> > > is identical to buffer and output_size is 10
> > > (PING_BUFFER_SIZE).
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sending this to hand it off to you guys. I'm still
> > > looking at this myself to see if I can implement it or figure
> > > out the command code, but I'm sure the people on this list
> > > have more experience doing this.
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me know if you have any questions or want me to redo with
> > > some changes.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David Richardson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Mark Ellis
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 00:39 +0200, David Richardson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Mark Ellis
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 22:10 +0200, David
> > > Eriksson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:07 -0700, Captain
> > > Fourier wrote:
> > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have been trying to get CeRapiInvoke
> > > to work. Just using
> > > > the unit
> > > > > > tests in the release. All I get is
> > > -2147467263 as a return
> > > > result.
> > > > >
> > > > > 0x80004001 means "not implemented"
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is CeRapiInvoke implemented? Is it still
> > > only Stream mode?
> > > > >
> > > > > UTSL :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately it has not been implemented
> > > for Windows Mobile
> > > > 5 or newer
> > > > > devices. Any takers on the synce-devel
> > > list?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your time,
> > > > > > Rob
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > David Eriksson,
> > > http://www.divideandconquer.se/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rob, I'll take a look at this sometime, but
> > > my time is very
> > > > limited at
> > > > the moment, so I'll need three things, the
> > > dll you're using on
> > > > the
> > > > device and the code you're using to call it,
> > > and the command
> > > > code for
> > > > CeRapiInvoke on WM5 :)
> > > >
> > > > I believe Rob was trying to execute the test located
> > > at
> > > >
> > >
> http://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/synce/trunk/librapi2/tests/CeRapiInvoke/which
> has a DLL with it.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ah yes, I've never noticed that there !
> > >
> > > > If someone can briefly explain how I would go about
> > > getting the
> > > > command code for CeRapiInvoke on WM5, I have the
> > > necessary hardware
> > > > and time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Theoretically, run a small program on a windows host
> > > that just
> > > RapiInit's and calls the command we're interested in,
> > > and capture the
> > > transmission on the network interface using eg.
> > > wireshark.
> > >
> > > Of course, being MS it's rarely that straightforward,
> > > and if David is
> > > correct it could be a lot more complex. However, if
> > > you could use the
> > > test prog for CeRapiInvoke from windows and capture
> > > everything over the
> > > interface, we might be fortunate.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't have anything set up to generate the
> > > call
> > > > on Windows to capture that code, so someone
> > > will have to find
> > > > it for me.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SynCE-Devel mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
otherinvoke.pcap
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
