On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:02 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:49 -0700, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > How are you pulling in the libeassync headers/flags? > > > > There is a PKG_CHECK_MODULES(EASSYNC) in configure-sub.in. Currently I > > override the lack of a proper .pc by setting EASSYNC_CFLAGS and > > EASSYNC_LIBS as configure variables. > > OK, so I haven't actually broken the build for you by 'assuming' that > they'll be set correctly in the SyncEvolution build?
It was broken by removing the "if ENABLE_MODULES" check in Makefile.am and latter by hard-coding compile flags there. > > > Should I couple that with actually providing a .pc file for libeassync? > > > > Yes, that would be the right solution. > > Oh, I know it's the right solution. The question was more "Do I really > need to do this *now*, at 2am". I'm taking your above response as a > 'no' :) Indeed, this is not important. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
