On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:40 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> With these changes, I'm down to only one failure
>
> The one about TestDBusSession.testSecondSession, right?

Correct.

> I'm looking at
> it now. As I suspected, the Connman class is to blame. The mock class
> remains active and then messes with the mainloop, which confuses the
> other test.
>
>> Unfortunately, the "same results"
>> means that it also has the defaultPeer issue which I'm trying to find
>> a fix for.
>
> See my other mail about how defaultPeer should be stored (gdb back
> traces, etc.).
>
> Note that you can set
>  debugger = "gdb"
> at the top of test-dbus.py to invoke an interactive debug session on
> syncevo-dbus-server while running a single test.
>

Yes, thanks. I'm aware of the debugger option. Working on it.

Cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to