On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: [snip] > > I'd link to http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/evolution/ > > and describe it without referring to any particular version. > > So in other words, a page which wraps downloads.syncevolution.org and > lists the currently relevant files?
Yeah, though I wouldn't try to keep it linking to the latest version, unless you have some automated system for that. That would still need people to look through a directory list, but it would be better and easier than now. [snip] > > I'm suggesting removing comments, though you are the best judge of how > > it has been used so far. > > Laissez-faire and preserving everything except for spam comments. But have the developers been able to respond to everything there, and do people feel helped? > > Yes, restricting comments to a single discussion page would be an > > improvement. But I really doubt that it's a good way to handle feedback. > > Indeed, it should only be used for comments which are obviously not > referring to the current page or became obsolete. > > > > Many users left comments randomly anyway, without directly > > > referring to the current page. > > > > Yes, which makes things seem neglected. > > Which is the case to some extend. I could use help on an on-going basis > for keeping the web site in good order. I know from past experience > that I will not always have the time to do this myself. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
