On Do, 2011-07-21 at 14:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > [snip] > > > I'd link to http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/evolution/ > > > and describe it without referring to any particular version. > > > > So in other words, a page which wraps downloads.syncevolution.org and > > lists the currently relevant files? > > Yeah, though I wouldn't try to keep it linking to the latest version, > unless you have some automated system for that.
Is that really substantially different from the "installation" page? > > > I'm suggesting removing comments, though you are the best judge of how > > > it has been used so far. > > > > Laissez-faire and preserving everything except for spam comments. > > But have the developers been able to respond to everything there, and do > people feel helped? I typically reply to all questions within a few days. What I haven't done is remove old conversations or move comments to more suitable locations. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
