Hi, I've been working on retrieving the immutable vendor and product id provided by the Bluetooth Device ID profile (DIP). See my bluetooth-device-id branch[1] for what's been pushed so far.
Being that we now have a means of getting reliable device information it seems to me that in the cases where this information was attainable, a matching score is no longer needed. If the fingerprint matches the product name from the look-up table exactly (and it will because we've created the lookup table and the template fingerprints) we suggest just that one template instead of several. If we didn't get this product name from the look-up table then everything should behave as normal because we can't trust the user-modifiable device name string. Does this sound reasonable or are there other reasons you'd want more than one template to choose from even when you're sure which device you're dealing with? Cheers, Chris [1] https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-middleware/syncevolution/commits/bluetooth-device-id _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
