On Di, 2011-08-16 at 15:51 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote:
> I've created a script so that users can easily get and then submit the
> information that we need. It's not perfect but it seems to work
> alright. Here's the gitorious link:
> https://gitorious.org/bluetooth-device-id-inspector
>
> I've also got a blog post ready to go once I get some feedback on the script.
When I ran it, I got the following question:
What company makes this phone?
There was no other output that would have allowed me to identify which
of my paired Bluetooth devices the script was talking about. I guess it
should have printed the user-assigned device name first, plus perhaps
the MAC address.
In the script you volunteer to collect the feedback. So you intend to
stay around? Great, welcome :-)
Should we encourage users to also try syncing with their device, so that
we not only get "this device exists" but also "it works with this
config"?
It shouldn't be required because the hurdle is a lot higher (must
install SyncEvolution first, may change data on phone).
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
