On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Chris Kühl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Do, 2011-08-04 at 17:42 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I was working based on the assumption that our look-up table of devices
>>> > and the corresponding entries in the templates will be very small.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Yes this is small currently, but should grow. And I plan on trying to
>>> crowd source this information once the Desktop Summit is over. Of
>>> course as you state below this doesn't mean we know which template
>>> this should be assigned to.
>>
>> I was trying to grow the list of know and tested devices with the
>> http://syncevolution.org/wiki/phone-compatibility-template template page
>> and the resulting Wiki query for "phone":
>> http://syncevolution.org/taxonomy/term/phone
>>
>> The result has been somewhat mixed. Directly after the initial
>> SyncEvolution 1.0 release, some entries were added, but that stopped
>> soon after.
>>
>> It definitely would be good to advertise that SyncEvolution really works
>> with phones and how to report success/failure.
>
> I'll put together a blog post and script or one-liner to make it easy
> for people to submit new device id entries.
>

I've created a script so that users can easily get and then submit the
information that we need. It's not perfect but it seems to work
alright. Here's the gitorious link:
https://gitorious.org/bluetooth-device-id-inspector

I've also got a blog post ready to go once I get some feedback on the script.

Cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to