BTW: pcre is already in use in libsynthesis, so you'll not create a new dependency when using it...
On Oct 18, 2011, at 20:25 , Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:10 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> What about pcre? Its fairly low level and used by quite a few OS >> features (at least in Fedora) and the configure for syncevolution >> already explicitly checks for it so it looks like syncevolution >> already uses it somewhere. > > I thought it was limited to only matching. Checking again I find, at > least in the C++ bindings, also a Replace() operation. It's a bit more > limited than boost::Xpressive (cannot provide a callback for the > replace, only supports \0-9 in the replacement string). One point in > favor of pcre is UTF-8 support. > > Thanks for the reminder, pcre indeed might be suitable. > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > _______________________________________________ > SyncEvolution mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
