On Di, 2011-10-18 at 20:25 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:10 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > What about pcre? Its fairly low level and used by quite a few OS > > features (at least in Fedora) and the configure for syncevolution > > already explicitly checks for it so it looks like syncevolution > > already uses it somewhere. > > I thought it was limited to only matching. Checking again I find, at > least in the C++ bindings, also a Replace() operation. It's a bit more > limited than boost::Xpressive (cannot provide a callback for the > replace, only supports \0-9 in the replacement string). One point in > favor of pcre is UTF-8 support. > > Thanks for the reminder, pcre indeed might be suitable.
For the record, I started to use pcre. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
