I'm sorry, don't understand me wrong. I understand that such project requires a lot of resources, time, people involved, support form big companies etc. in order to be free ...
50$ would be fine if i had chance to have sourcecode, have reliable solution that works fine. btw. I was thinking about http://code.google.com/p/mooha/ PHP based SyncML server. But, it seems that project is not active lately and i was not able to start it at all. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 09:33 +0200, vedran alajbegovic wrote: > > I saw also some PHP based SyncML servers, Have you tried those? > > I think you are talking about Horde and derivatives. I've tested against > them at some point. Overall quality was average. > > > btw. It seems that decent Synthesis costs almost 50$ for android.... > > > > > > :( no that is not an option, this solution should be free.. > > I understand the reluctance to rely on a closed source solution. But why > does it have to be free as in free beer? Let me put it very bluntly: why > do you think you are entitled to someone else's time and money to > develop such a solution for you? > > If you don't want to pay Synthesis (who, after all, made their source > code available so that free/libre software like SyncEvolution could be > built), then you'll have to pay with your time instead, by identifying > bugs, asking Funambol for help and/or submitting patches for the free > software that you want to use. There's no free lunch. My own time for > assisting with this is limited. > > Regarding the Funambol clients, the main problem is that they make > assumptions about a "configuration" data source on the server, which > only exists in Funambol servers: > > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4FFD4290.5070401%40funambol.com&forum_name=funambol-discussions > > One could try to emulate that by configuring a file-based source in the > SyncEvolution server: > > syncevolution --configure \ > --source-property type=file:text/plain \ > --source-property evolutionsource=file://${datapath}/configuration \ > --source-property sync=two-way \ > ${peer} configuration > > Whether that helps is unknown. Funambol has not responded to questions > about what that source is supposed to contain. > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > >
_______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
