Hello, Patrick, community.
1st of all I wanted to convince you that I appreciate SyncEvolution.
This is a great piece of software, and what's most important: it works.
But now I wanted to raise one question: do you intend to refactor the
design of it?
I mean I just read out the
https://syncevolution.org/documentation/syncevolution-usage#terminology
and it is statistically:
Lines 29
Words 837
Symbols 5155
This means tens of concept terms! I mean: it's not easy to understand
and surely takes noticeable effort to get used to. This is especially
wonderful knowing that opensync was already there, which had _much_
simpler design (while I understand that it may not cover all the needs
that syncevo deal with).
I don't mean to criticize but just ask: do you plan to do something
with it, say, for the next major release?
Best regards,
--
Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer
================================================
email: [email protected]
home: http://johan-notes.blogspot.com/
ALT Linux Sisyphus
================================================
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
