On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:56 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote: > Hi, Patrick, > > On 19.09.2012 13:32:59, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:30 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > at last I feel confident enough to move on: > > > https://syncevolution.org/wiki/architecture-overview > > > Please fix it to the TRUE state then I make a proposal :) > > > > That looks like a rewrite of the terminology section in the > > README.rst, right? > > No, > this was written from scratch, I just took one phrase from > https://syncevolution.org/documentation/syncevolution-usage (which is > README.rst, right?)
Right. Your current understanding as documented on that page is correct. Writing it up is definitely a good exercise, I'm just not sure what to do with the page now. To make the relationship with the "official" documentation clear I've added a link to the terminology section. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
