On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:30 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote: > Hi, > at last I feel confident enough to move on: > https://syncevolution.org/wiki/architecture-overview > Please fix it to the TRUE state then I make a proposal :)
That looks like a rewrite of the terminology section in the README.rst, right? It's a bit briefer, albeit at the cost of not defining some terms. I'm not sure whether it is an improvement - that's something that users need to decide. I don't agree with your definition of "Database" (= "A Database is a type of data which is in a Source."). You list "addressbook", "calendar", etc. as examples. for databases. Those are not databases, they merely refer to one. A more accurate definition is that a database is a collection of items of a certain type (an address book database contains contacts). "addressbook" is the name of a source which is defined as part of some of the configuration templates. In addition, "addressbook" is also used as alias for backends which provide access to databases which contain contacts. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
