On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 14:37 +0200, Ole Wolf wrote: > The interface to SyncEvolution is secondary as far as I'm concerned. > If I can write a command-line utility that converts between Google > Tasks and a local iCalendar text file, it will probably be a > straight-forward task for someone else to create a SyncEvolution > back-end that uses that utility.
Such a backend has a pending feature request: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52673 I agree that it would be fairly easy to write, but it still needs someone to do it. Instead of one single iCalendar file, perhaps you can write and update individual items in a directory, where each file is a VALENDAR with a VTODO inside? That is something that the existing file backend in SyncEvolution can read and write. The file backend uses file modifications to detect changes, so you would have to make sure not to rewrite files unless they really changed. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
