On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 12:14 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > >Can we agree that we stick to the terminology defined in the > >README.rst? > >If that section is unclear, then let's clarify that first before trying > >to deduct the terms from example command lines. > I wasn't yet introduced to the manna of the README.rst. Things are > starting to look a little clearer now.
It's the same content as the https://syncevolution.org/documentation/syncevolution-usage that you mentioned earlier. Would it help to make the TERMINOLOGY section more prominent? How? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
