On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 07:10 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 09:03:22, "Patrick Ohly" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 19:48 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> >>  BTW, when I request --source-property ? and --sync-property ?,
> >>  databasePassword and databaseUser do not show up.
> >
> >Huh? They show up here.
> >
> >$ syncevolution --version
> >SyncEvolution 1.4.1
> >...
> >$ syncevolution --source-property '?'
> >...
> >databaseUser = evolutionuser (no default, shared), databasePassword = 
> >evolutionpassword (no default, shared)
> >
> My mistake, this not showing up was a grep artifact I caused. The model 
> is updated. This user/password is not necessarily tied to evolution, 
> right? It is used by the webDAV backends too.

Right. This is related to what I just said about the config system not
knowing the exact semantic of the properties. The help text is part of
the config system and tries to summarize how the properties are used,
but sometimes isn't updated together with the code using them.

In fact, it can't always accurately represent everything, because
backends (and their use of source properties) are plugable while the
config system is part of core SyncEvolution. Someone may add a new
backend and can use the existing properties without recompiling
SyncEvolution, but he or she can't update the core description of the
property.

> Just to make sure again, 'shared' here means 'belongs to a data source' 
> (and it's shared from the POV of the sync config). 'Unshared' means it's 
> part of a SyncSource (and thus exclusively for the sync config 
> involved).

Correct.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.



_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to