On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 08:56 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > On 11/04/2014 10:02:05, "Patrick Ohly" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >In fact, it can't always accurately represent everything, because > >backends (and their use of source properties) are plugable while the > >config system is part of core SyncEvolution. Someone may add a new > >backend and can use the existing properties without recompiling > >SyncEvolution, but he or she can't update the core description of the > >property. > Hey! Is this documented?
You mean adding your own backend? There's an older blog article about it which still kind of applies: http://www.estamos.de/blog/2008/08/04/syncml-client-do-it-yourself-style/ Of course, a lot has changed in the last 5+ years. BTW, looking through tech articles that I wrote I also found something about the config system. Not sure whether you also saw it when going through syncevolution.org: https://syncevolution.org/development https://syncevolution.org/development/configuration-handling And the rationale behind local sync is also linked to: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.syncevolution/1543 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.syncevolution/2177 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
