Hi,
I want to thank everyone who provided WGLC reviews and comments. These
help a lot to keep this process going. (..and we got our draft in before
the cutoff date. :)
I've looked over these changes and feel that they address the WGLC
comments that were received. I'd appreciate it if the people who did the
reviews would also do a check. As everyone has noticed, this document is
closely following RFC 5425 and I'd like to keep that format.
David has written up a preliminary shepherding document. I'll edit that
and send a copy around to the WG before submitting it to the IESG sometime
next week.
Many thanks,
Chris
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
I just submitted draft -02 of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls. Thanks to all the
folks that submitted comments on the draft, I think I have incorporated
them into the latest revision. Here is a summary of the changes:
1. Reworked the introduction with helpful suggestions from Chris
Lonvick.
2. Removed the definition of connection and made sure when the term is
used it refers to a "DTLS connection"
3. Cleaned up text about security requirements
4. Cleaned up text in section 5.1
5. Removed some extraneous text from section 5.3
6. Added certificate fingerprint as an example of what can be stored to
help correlate identity with sent and received data.
7. Fixed text on message size
8. Removed section on "Cryptographic level" because it was confusing and
did not add anything.
9. Changed SYSLOG and Syslog to syslog where appropriate.
I think the draft is ready to go to the IESG.
Thanks,
Joe
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
