Thanks, Chris. That work.
Rich On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Yeah; we got a little overzealous on that. Let's try this: > > Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to > provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog. This > transport should only be used as described in Section 4.3 of [RFC5426]. > > Thanks, > Chris > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Richard Graveman wrote: > >> Chis, >> >>> I've looked over these changes and feel that they address the WGLC >>> comments >>> that were received. >> >> I strongly disagree on several counts. First, the new document says: >> >> Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to >> provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog. This >> transport is NOT RECOMMENDED. >> >> NOT RECOMMENDED means SHOULD NOT implement. SHOULD NOT implement means >> DEPRECATED. There was no WG discussion of deprecating RFC 5426. >> >> In fact, in some cases, protocol security may not be needed, for a >> variety of reasons. In other cases, security may already be provided >> by, say, IPsec, required in IPv6. >> >> Saying that the work completed just last year is deprecated without >> any WG discussion is absurd. >> >> Rich Graveman >> > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
