Hi, As a co-chair looking for a way forward, I was considering asking for volunteers to write a syslog-over-SSH draft as the likely alternative to TLS as a security solution. I welcome the discussion of a 3195bis alternative rorposal as a way to move forward.
Thanks Rainer. David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:05 AM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] IESG secure transport requirement can > be quicklysolved... > > Hi Everyone, > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > > > I would appreciate if the chairs could try to reach consensus on my > > proposal. > > > > Comments are appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Rainer > > I'll apologize up front for not paricipating in some recent > dicussions. > I'm on a business trip and rather busy with the day job right now. > > I am willing to listen to a discussion of this proposal. As > Rainer says, > please provide some input and comments. > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > Syslog@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
