Hi,

There are good things and bad things that come with having a new WG
co-chair.
I think I have helped the WG by driving the completion of milestones.
That's the good part.
The bad part is I bring my own opinions of what adequate review means.

The IETF has started using a new process, called document shepherding,
for the advancement of documents to the standards-track. The chairs
are given much more responsibility and authority to decide whether
documents are ready for advancement. They are expected to write up
their analyses of WG issues, consensus, and degree of review of the
documents being submitted, and these analyses will be reviewed at
every step of the process after this point, as the members of the IESG
try to determine whether the document really is ready for advancment
to standards-track. You can see the details they expect us to provide
by reading draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-07 (which has been
expanded quite a bit from the -05- draft used during your earlier
WGLCs).

I have shepherded a number of documents through the process, and I
know how difficult it can be to get documents through the process, and
how much the documents can be delayed during the standards-approval
process if they are not really ready for submission to that process.

I am concerned that the documents have not gotten adequate review
during WGLC. There have been very few comments made, and I would like
to see more reviews done by the members of the WG for each of these
documents. 

If you have problems with the documents, speak up now, so the chairs
can be sure your concerns are recognized and have been addressed. 

If you have read the document, and found no important problems and
have no significant objections to the document, and belive it is ready
to be submitted to the advancement process, please send a note to the
WG saying so. 

David Harrington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to