> > I questioned the need for a version number for the TLS transport in > > private conversation and now I bring this up again here. > > Was that private? I thought it was on-list. Anyhow... I
The public messege can be found at: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.html It seems there was a rough concensus that the version number was welcomed to save port resource when we discussed this issue on the mailing list. That is the reason why a version number is there. > > This does not at all sound very convincing to me (and I assume what > > the author wanted to say is not well said because I believe the > > trigger for not trying again would be a close after sending > the first > > syslog message and not after the successful TLS handshake). > > I, too, assume this was meant... Yeah, this sentence should be improved if version number is kept there. > > > But my suggestion is to remove the version as well as this text. > So do I now... _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
