> > The public messege can be found at: > > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.html > > > > It seems there was a rough concensus that the version number was > > welcomed to save port resource when we discussed this issue on the > > mailing list. That is the reason why a version number is there. > > Agreed, I am guilty of not saying "I agree" on the mailing > list. But to me that did not look like consensus but simply > an overlooked message (there were no responses at all...). >
Don't feel guilty because you did say "I applaude":-) http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01198.html I also found support from other active WG members. Anyway, let's reconsider the decision and make it right! > Rainer > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
