On 05/11/2011 03:59 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:55:24PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> On 5/10/2011 3:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de> >>> >>> In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root >>> filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel >>> filesystems and provide a proper mount point for it in sysfs. >>> >>> For selinuxfs, this mount point should be in /sys/fs/selinux/ >> >> It seems that we might want this to be an LSM interface standard. >> Is the call to kobject_create_and_add and associated cleanup all >> that's required? I would want Smack to follow the convention as >> well. > > You could always just create a subdir under /sys/security/ if you have > your own filesystem, but I don't think that Smack has one, right? > > Is it going to get one? If so, we might want to revisit the idea of > securityfs if no one is actually using it... > resending, as this looks to have been lost
AppArmor, IMA, and TOMOYO are using securityfs currently. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
