On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:28:36PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 18:59 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:55:24PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > On 5/10/2011 3:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de> > > > > > > > > In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root > > > > filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel > > > > filesystems and provide a proper mount point for it in sysfs. > > > > > > > > For selinuxfs, this mount point should be in /sys/fs/selinux/ > > > > > > It seems that we might want this to be an LSM interface standard. > > > Is the call to kobject_create_and_add and associated cleanup all > > > that's required? I would want Smack to follow the convention as > > > well. > > > > You could always just create a subdir under /sys/security/ if you have > > your own filesystem, but I don't think that Smack has one, right? > > > > Is it going to get one? If so, we might want to revisit the idea of > > securityfs if no one is actually using it... > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > IMA uses securityfs. The suggested securityfs mount point has > been /sys/kernel/security.
Yes, that is correct, and isn't changing. This patch is only for selinux to move their mount point, nothing else. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
