On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:22:42PM +0200, John Johansen wrote: > On 05/11/2011 03:59 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:55:24PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> On 5/10/2011 3:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de> > >>> > >>> In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root > >>> filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel > >>> filesystems and provide a proper mount point for it in sysfs. > >>> > >>> For selinuxfs, this mount point should be in /sys/fs/selinux/ > >> > >> It seems that we might want this to be an LSM interface standard. > >> Is the call to kobject_create_and_add and associated cleanup all > >> that's required? I would want Smack to follow the convention as > >> well. > > > > You could always just create a subdir under /sys/security/ if you have > > your own filesystem, but I don't think that Smack has one, right? > > > > Is it going to get one? If so, we might want to revisit the idea of > > securityfs if no one is actually using it... > > > resending, as this looks to have been lost > > AppArmor, IMA, and TOMOYO are using securityfs currently.
Great, then it will not go anywhere. greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
