On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2013/2/5 Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org>: > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:10 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > >> We do not want to place shared libraries with private APIs in the > >> system. Other people might rely on stuff which we can never track. > > > > Note that it installs into a private subdirectory, so people writing > > apps can't just use -lsystemd-shared in their linker lines in their > > build systems, and unless they also go to the effort of adding an rpath > > or LD_LIBRARY_PATH for /usr/lib/systemd/private to their executables, > > dynamic linking will also fail. > > Please don't add such a private shared library. Aside from being ugly > and having systemd and it's tools have to use an RPATH, it makes (as > already mentioned) packaging udev separately harder. I think a few KB > of disk space do not warrant that change. OK, I guess that this is not an option.
I now pushed a simple patch from David Strauss which adds an additional dependency and fixes the build. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel