On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:38:26PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> 2013/2/5 Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org>: >> >> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:10 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> We do not want to place shared libraries with private APIs in the >> >> >> system. Other people might rely on stuff which we can never track. >> >> > >> >> > Note that it installs into a private subdirectory, so people writing >> >> > apps can't just use -lsystemd-shared in their linker lines in their >> >> > build systems, and unless they also go to the effort of adding an rpath >> >> > or LD_LIBRARY_PATH for /usr/lib/systemd/private to their executables, >> >> > dynamic linking will also fail. >> >> >> >> Please don't add such a private shared library. Aside from being ugly >> >> and having systemd and it's tools have to use an RPATH, it makes (as >> >> already mentioned) packaging udev separately harder. I think a few KB >> >> of disk space do not warrant that change. >> > OK, I guess that this is not an option. >> > >> > I now pushed a simple patch from David Strauss which adds an additional >> > dependency and fixes the build. >> >> We cannot do that. Libudev should not link the dynamic libs from systemd. >> >> I changed it now and people with the non-working --as-needed need to >> check if that works for them ... > Thanks, your approach is much better. Is is actually necesary > to apply the same fix to libsystemd-journal. I'm pushing a fix.
Ah. nice, that it seems to works. Thanks a lot for taking care of the rest. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
