On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:59:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.04.2013 19:53, schrieb Kok: > >> thanks, i will give it a try > >> why not "Type=forking"? > >> > >> in my expierience a service works with simple/forking and only > >> one of them while i must say my low-level understanding may > >> not be enouh to realize what to use............. > > > > The daemon doesn't need to do extra work to fork, and systemd won't > > need to do all the work associated with tracking a forked process - > > it's a lot less work, thus more efficient, and actually more robust > > hi > > does this mean in recent systemd-versions it is no longer needed > to use "Type=forking" at all while it was a must for some servcies > in early versions? It's still necessary, if the service forks. But if the service *can* be instructed not to fork, then it's beneficial to do so.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
