Am 15.04.2013 19:53, schrieb Kok: >> thanks, i will give it a try >> why not "Type=forking"? >> >> in my expierience a service works with simple/forking and only >> one of them while i must say my low-level understanding may >> not be enouh to realize what to use............. > > The daemon doesn't need to do extra work to fork, and systemd won't > need to do all the work associated with tracking a forked process - > it's a lot less work, thus more efficient, and actually more robust
hi
does this mean in recent systemd-versions it is no longer needed
to use "Type=forking" at all while it was a must for some servcies
in early versions?
i thougt a service which forks by itself and not defined
with "Type=forking" is killed after the PID changed because
systemd thinks the main-PID died
[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ systemctl status preload.service
preload.service - Adaptive readahead daemon
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/preload.service; enabled)
Active: active (running) since Mo 2013-04-15 19:55:10 CEST; 1min 45s ago
Process: 795 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/preload --verbose 1 (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 801 (preload)
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/preload.service
└─801 /usr/sbin/preload --verbose 1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
