Am 15.04.2013 20:50, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:59:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 15.04.2013 19:53, schrieb Kok: >>>> thanks, i will give it a try >>>> why not "Type=forking"? >>>> >>>> in my expierience a service works with simple/forking and only >>>> one of them while i must say my low-level understanding may >>>> not be enouh to realize what to use............. >>> >>> The daemon doesn't need to do extra work to fork, and systemd won't >>> need to do all the work associated with tracking a forked process - >>> it's a lot less work, thus more efficient, and actually more robust >> >> hi >> >> does this mean in recent systemd-versions it is no longer needed >> to use "Type=forking" at all while it was a must for some servcies >> in early versions? > It's still necessary, if the service forks. But if the service *can* > be instructed not to fork, then it's beneficial to do so
thanks! i will look whioch of our services are running with "Type=simple" P.S.: i love systemd and i loved the idea from the very beginning only the too realy state in Fedora 15 made me that frustrated!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
