On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 25.03.2014 01:40, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > >> This is just a kludge... Why is system.journal to be treated differently? > >> It seems that the proper fix is to set the mode on the directory properly > >> during installation. > > > > Precisely, packaging script are expected to properly chown and setfacl > > the directory on install. From the .spec file in Fedora: > > This completely ignores the problem Dave mentions in his earlier post: > Volatile journals are owned by root:root.
I talked to Lennart about this last night on IRC -- we agreed that the solution here is to introduce an 'M' action in the tmpfiles language which is a recursive version of 'm'. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
